Friday, February 28, 2020

Infant observation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Infant observation - Essay Example As I watched the child, after he had taken the yogurt, I could observe that he was able to wave at me and this is a sign of trust as explained by Erik Erikson in the first stage of development where there is either trust or mistrust. Trust occurs when the child is able to have faith in people around him and relate with well without fear that they could be harmful to him, while mistrust occurs when the child is unable to relate with people around him feeling that they have ill will on him. In addition, under Maslow hierarchy of needs where one seeks security and love after his basic needs such as food, clothes and shelter have been satisfied, i was able to observe that he only waved at me after taking yogurt, a sign to show hat he was satisfied with food and now needed love and protection. In this case, yogurt served as food. He moved his head up and down when music played as a way of dancing; this could be as result of classical conditioning in the theory of behaviorism. Classical co nditioning in behaviorism occurs when one is able to associate certain object or incidents that frequently happen with something familiar to ones immediate environment. This child learnt to associate music with dancing. He grabbed his friends’ hair and pulled it, stood by himself and walked across the room by holding the cribs. Additionally, he was able to make the ball roll round, shake the rattle, stretch out in the floor, and act like as if he was talking on the phone. The child is able to do this during infant development stage according to cognitive theory (Douglas 35). In his sensory development, I could observe that he was able to touch his friend’s hair and pull it, see me, and wave towards my direction when we first met. According to attachment theory, the child at infant stage is able to relate well with people close to him especially his caregiver. Therefore, from the above observation, it appears that he is already attached to his

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Compare and contrast two works Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Compare and contrast two works - Essay Example on the way to Canterbury and two stories on the way back, but either Chaucer never finished the journey or the entire collection has never been found. What is unique about the tales is that each character has a different voice and a different perspective on life. As a result, many of these characters and stories represent the dominant ideals of the age because the characters tell stories that relate closely to their personalities and life station. In many cases, these stories can be juxtaposed against each other to show two different views of the same concept such as the issue of deceit. While deceit is the backbone of much medieval, and modern, humor, it can also be quite harmful with the only difference being in how it is practiced. An example of this kind of juxtaposition can be found when one works to compare the Miller’s prologue and tale with that of the Pardoner. The Miller tells a comic story of a man, his young wife and her exploits with the young men of the town whil e the Pardoner tells a story of three young men who set out to kill Death and are merely able to find him through their own greed and depravity. While people are hurt in the Miller’s tale, the story focuses more upon the comedy of the situation as opposed to the Pardoner’s tale, which is full of moral warning for the danger deceit brings to the soul. Comparing these two stories reveals a sort of mirror image between the Miller, an honest man who tells a story of comic deceit, and the Pardoner, a dishonest man who tell a story of deceit as damnation. The differences between these two characters are perhaps among the first things to stand out in such a comparison. The Miller is introduced as a drunken loudmouth who cannot be silenced once he decides to speak. The host has called up on the Monk to tell the next story, but it is the Miller who speaks up, first insisting he be allowed to tell his story, â€Å"Either I’ll speak, or go on my own way† (124), then refusing to alter